Make text bigger  Make text smaller  Toggle background color  Bookmark/Share

Phony Science for Phony Policies

I was browsing Capitalism Magazine and found two articles that sparked my interest. The first one is about the phony science behind the second-hand smoke claims. The second is about the hyped up science behind global-warming. What is most interesting is how both issues tie into each other.

Both stories show you how people are trying to use the government to force their choices and beliefs onto other people. What is most troubling about this is how they are committing fraud and getting away with it.

According to Objectivism this is immoral and is considered a use of force. The people that manipulated the reports and finds should be prosecuted. Lucky for them, their views and findings are the popular opinion so I don’t think that is happening anytime soon.

Reason requires freedom, self-confidence and self-esteem. It requires the right to think and act on the guidance of one’s thinking – the right to live by one’s own independent judgment. Intellectual freedom cannot exist without political freedom; political freedom cannot exist without economic freedom; a free mind and a free market are corollaries. – p.25 For the New Intellectual, Ayn Rand

Read these articles (on smoking and warming) and tell me what you think. If you don’t agree let it be known and we can discuss it. This is an important issue and it needs more public attention.


Mother Earth vs. Mankind (Show 009)

On last night’s podcast recorded at TalkShoe.com, Brandon and I talk about Environmentalism. We also mention global-warming, but we did not discuss whether it exists or not. We just talk about how industry and individuals could prevent it, without needing more government control. (NOTE: I personally don’t think global-warming is a big deal and I have yet so see proof to makes me think differently.)

We also talked about how it seems there are people out there that put nature before man. They would rather see a person suffer just so a tree or an animal live unaffected by man. What these people don’t understand is that rights only apply to man, the rational animal.

I also mentioned that the Environmentalism movement should focus on education and persuading the population to think more “Green.” A way they could do that is by asking the government to give tax breaks to those who use alternative fuels, or asking stores to give a 10% discount to anyone that uses reusable bags. If there was something I, too, could get out of thinking “Green” then I would be more likely to do it. And I know I am not the only person who thinks that way.

We talked about a lot more but you will have to listen to it yourself. If you would like to be part of the show just go to TalkShoe.com and create an account. Then on Sundays at 8pm, login and join it on the show LIVE!


On-Again Off-Again Smoking Ban

Looks like the smoking ban in Pittsburgh is off again, which is a win for freedom. If you read this article in the Post Gazette you will see that the ban is off because of two smart business owners. They took their complaints to the state courts, and the courts agreed that it was unfair.

After reading this article you will find more proof that the free-market is still working to fix this “problem” on its own.

“Pat Joyce, owner of the 17th Street Cafe on the South Side, said … Our primary focus is dinner. I would say 90 to 95 percent of our guests had asked us to go nonsmoking.”

See, if enough people request these businesses to go nonsmoking, the smart business owners will give it to them. But if 95 percent of their customers want smoking then you better bet that they will want to keep it that way; and that’s fine. With businesses listening to the demand, you now have a choice between a business that does and one that doesn’t ban smoking. Everyone likes choices, so why would we want the government to take them away?


Banning Smoking Bans Freedom

In Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, they have passed a smoking ban for all public places and privately owned businesses. Here the government is going beyond its purpose by telling business owners how to run their business. If that seems okay to you, then you are NOT someone who values your freedom.

I would also like to let everyone know that I am NOT a smoker. I just value people’s right to choose. If you want to smoke and increase your risk of lung cancer, that is fine by me. Also, if you are a business owner and would like to let people smoke on your property, that is fine too, because you have the right to do whatever you want, as long as you don’t violate the rights of others.

This brings me to another point. People say that smoking doesn’t just hurt the people smoking; the secondhand smoke hurts the people around them. Well, that may be true, but there is simple solution to this problem. Don’t hang around people that smoke and don’t go to bars and restaurants that allow it. NO ONE is forcing you to smoke and breathe smoky air. I’m a non-smoker and I can’t remember the last time that I was bothered by a smoker. I guess that’s because I’ve trained myself to avoid it.

If everyone would just look around, they would see that capitalism (the free-market) was starting to take care of the situation for us. The businesses (bars and pubs) in the area were starting to offer smoke-free nights and rooms that were smoke-free. So if you didn’t want to be around secondhand smoke, you had a choice. But I guess that wasn’t enough for the freedom haters, so they lobbied the local government to pass this ban.

So what you smoke-free nuts should have done was, before crying to the government, try doing something yourself. Ask your favorite bar and restaurant to try having a smoke-free night. If you get enough people behind you, no rational businessman will say no.


Follow Us!

twitter facebook