<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Does It Mean to Be Objective?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkobjectivism.com/what-does-it-mean-to-be-objective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkobjectivism.com/what-does-it-mean-to-be-objective/</link>
	<description>We are Radicals for Reason</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:27:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fegosuigo</title>
		<link>http://talkobjectivism.com/what-does-it-mean-to-be-objective/comment-page-1/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Fegosuigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkobjectivism.com/?p=279#comment-816</guid>
		<description>ÑÑ‚Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒÑ Ð¾ÐºÐ°Ð·Ð°Ð»Ð°ÑÑŒ Ð¾Ñ‡ÐµÐ½ÑŒ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»ÐµÐ·Ð½Ð¾Ð¹. [Translation from Russian via Google Translate: This article has been very useful.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ÑÑ‚Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒÑ Ð¾ÐºÐ°Ð·Ð°Ð»Ð°ÑÑŒ Ð¾Ñ‡ÐµÐ½ÑŒ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»ÐµÐ·Ð½Ð¾Ð¹. [Translation from Russian via Google Translate: This article has been very useful.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burgess Laughlin</title>
		<link>http://talkobjectivism.com/what-does-it-mean-to-be-objective/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Burgess Laughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 02:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkobjectivism.com/?p=279#comment-808</guid>
		<description>The Ayn Rand Lexicon has an entry, â€œObjectivity,â€ that I have found helpful in thinking about the subject.

My understanding (drawn also in part from Tara Smithâ€™s series of lectures, â€œRationality and Objectivityâ€) is that objectivity, in the epistemological meaning, is a relationship between an idea in oneâ€™s mind and the facts of reality. The nature of the relationship is a logical one. In others, an idea (concept, principle, theory, or whole philosophy) is objective if it is drawn logically from facts of reality. It is not objective if the idea is arbitrary or is drawn from wishes, emotions, or imagined â€œmessagesâ€ from God or other alleged sources.

While objectivity is a relationship, rationality is the process used to establish objectivity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ayn Rand Lexicon has an entry, â€œObjectivity,â€ that I have found helpful in thinking about the subject.</p>
<p>My understanding (drawn also in part from Tara Smithâ€™s series of lectures, â€œRationality and Objectivityâ€) is that objectivity, in the epistemological meaning, is a relationship between an idea in oneâ€™s mind and the facts of reality. The nature of the relationship is a logical one. In others, an idea (concept, principle, theory, or whole philosophy) is objective if it is drawn logically from facts of reality. It is not objective if the idea is arbitrary or is drawn from wishes, emotions, or imagined â€œmessagesâ€ from God or other alleged sources.</p>
<p>While objectivity is a relationship, rationality is the process used to establish objectivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
